Confessions of a former Guantánamo prosecutor
The inside story of a military lawyer who discovered stunning injustice at the heart of the Bush administration’s military commissions.
By Stacy Sullivan
Editor’s note: Since May, staff members of Human Rights Watch have been reporting on U.S. judicial proceedings at Guantánamo for Salon.
Oct. 23, 2008 |
When Army Lt. Col. Darrell Vandeveld began his work in May 2007 as a prosecutor at the Guantánamo Bay military commissions, the Iraq war veteran was one of the most enthusiastic and tenacious lawyers working on behalf of the Bush administration. He took on seven cases. In court hearings he dismissed claims of prisoner abuse as “embellishment” and “exaggeration.” Once, when a detainee asked for legal representation only for the purpose of challenging the legitimacy of the military commissions, Vandeveld ridiculed the request as “idiotic.”
So it came as a shock in mid-September when Vandeveld announced that he was resigning as a prosecutor because he had grave doubts about the integrity of the system he had so vigorously defended.
In the days following his resignation — now testifying, remarkably, for the defense counsel in one of his own cases — Vandeveld said that he went from being a “true believer” in the military commissions to feeling “truly deceived” about them. His deep ethical qualms hinged foremost on the fact that potentially critical evidence had been withheld from the defense by the government.
Vandeveld says he was pressured explicitly by superiors not to talk about his work at Guantánamo. Until now, the details of his story have largely been kept from public view. He maintains that he is not ready to speak at length about his decision to resign, but in several e-mail exchanges with me this week, as well as in a series of recent e-mail exchanges he had with others involved in the military commissions, a picture emerges of a man who struggled through an intense crisis of conscience. When he took action, he was ridiculed and bullied by his bosses for questioning the fairness of the system. The military also subjected Vandeveld to a mental-health evaluation after he decided to resign, perhaps aimed at undercutting his credibility.
Vandeveld’s story reveals the painful struggle of a devoutly religious Catholic who became increasingly disturbed by a process he came to view as fundamentally unjust. Unable to confide in his family and friends because so much of the information in the cases he was working on was classified, he took the unusual step of confiding in his opposing counsel. He also consulted a priest online.
Vandeveld is at least the fourth prosecutor to resign from the highly criticized military commissions, but his account is perhaps the most stark and will surely cast a lasting pall over the process. On Tuesday, the Department of Defense announced that it was dropping charges against five detainees whose cases Vandeveld was prosecuting — though not the controversial case that prompted his resignation.
That case, the one that ultimately provoked Vandeveld’s change of heart, was supposed to be a slam dunk for the government. But as Vandeveld would come to discover, it was plagued by problems. Read the rest of this entry »
Below is an example of what was happening in the 60s when Ernesto Che Guevara reunido con Simone de Beauvoir y Jean Paul Sartre, en La Habana Cuba joined together for conversation. This was one of the many circles where Beauvoir found herself [her philosophic circles, mind you] changing the face of feminism and philosophy and ehtics. My circle is changing; morphing perhaps? I’m not sure? I just know that I trust in the truth of goodness. This is how the river winds. The rapids of this river hurts sometimes, but that’s why I have a deep and abiding circle of philosphy of truth, goodness, and beauty which surrounds me and roots me. I miss that Texas rio just like I miss those pages of textual narratives through which I would thumb through. But, this circle is helping me reclaim that and I’m hopeful–I’m just hopeful in the truth of the goodness of love, essential love which Beuavoir and Sartre shared.


Recent Comments