Tag Archives: Technology

The What-ness of Social Media

Robyn Henderson-Espinoza
21 April 2012
Social Media Praxis, Iliff School of Theology

“The What-ness of Social Media in 140 Characters”

Obviously, my title is a bit mis-leading. I will not attempt to digest social media in 140 characters. If I did, it would be this: Social media, as a relational practice, is the beginning of our ability to truly relate, which is always mediated by virtual differences.

What do I mean by social media being a relational practice?

Let me answer this question by situating myself in the discourse. I am an Ethicist. I like to think about our moral imagination, moral agency and ethics; and so, when I assert the notion that social media is a relational practice, I also am suggesting that there are ethical implications here.

There has long been the question that Scholars have raised regarding the relationship between human bodies and virtual bodies. With social media, you have many bodies engaging with each other: from actual human bodies, machine bodies (like computers), and virtual bodies, like avatars and so forth. This creates a web of relating practices that indeed raises the question of the “what-ness” of social media, and especially so for today’s church.

For me, I created iRobyn. I was living in Chicago, and Twitter was all the hype. iRobyn is on Twitter as a politically queer voice, and iRobyn.com is a WordPress blog where I seek to work at the multiple intersections of religion, theology, race, queerness, sexuality, and ethics. In fact, when I have attended the American Academy of Religion, I have had conversations with people who call me iRobyn. What does this tell me about the power of creative possibilities and my own ability to create a voice, how ever virtual it is? I’ve discovered that social media is a relationship across many and multiple differences.

What might all this mean for today’s church?

What if the church embraced social media as a liturgical practice? If liturgy is the work of the people, and people of a local church began to engage with their own communities’ practices, then church might look a lot different–we might be able to live into the relational practices of our communities call to: care for the poor, feed the hungry, and so forth. Our churches might look less like a non-profit and more like a cathedral of hope, rooted in (insert here your religious practice): the call of Christ or the Divine, or what have you. What we can imagine is the ability for us all to develop a voice that lives as a social media voice.

The iRobyn voice is not necessarily the most academic voice; it is a public voice that is informed by culture, society, politics, and mediated by social media. When I blog, I write in the voice that makes most sense to me: an honestly engaged voice that is concerned about social practices that are often harming to multitude of communities. This ranges to a political voice that hopes for some political change. When I blog about theological issues or religious concerns, I write in a voice that has long-been acquainted with the practices of a local church, how ever agnostic I am these days…

What has been most helpful is that I quickly learned that for me I needed to have a multiplicity of voices. I run in circles that cut across many and multiple differences, so I needed to be able to speak to a variety of people, and sometimes my iRobyn voice merges. An example os this is when I blogged on Easter Sunday and posted an Oscar Romero quote and tied it to the murder of Trayvon Martin. It was titled: “Rise Again.” Now, I have no interest in being overly theological or affirming any sort of Resurrection of the Dead (sorry Orthodox Theologians). What was of interest to me here is to expose the intersections of theology, religion, sexuality, and race. It is in the multiple voices that iRobyn continues to exist and engage in a meaningful way.

The potential that today’s church has continues to open in multiple ways. From using social media to organize a group within a faith community or church to using Twitter to dialogue about a sermon’s content, a book study, or what have you. There seems to be no limit on what we can do with social media!

Friday Fireside Chats

One of the things I love, absolutely *love,* is the chance to connect w/ my colleagues.  This week has been an especially fruitful week in terms of connecting with a wide variety of colleagues.  I’ve been using FaceTime to connect with folks, talk about writing projects, AAR panels/proposals, and generally have enjoyed the chance to really enflesh collegiality across the miles and distance.  And when I mention distance, I do mean the far and wide colleagues–event skyped w/ Nina who is currently located in Cape Town, South Africa!  Today is no different!

Today is what I’m calling a Friday Fireside Chat.  I’m getting ready to FaceTime w/ Leila Ortiz who has been engaging Judith Butler’s Bodies That Matter:  on the discursive limits of “sex.”  We’ll be FaceTiming soon, and I’m ready because I’ve just reread the introduction this morning!

I’m unsure what will come of this Friday Fireside, but I imagine it will be all good stuff!  I’m sure we’ll talk in Spanglish, connect as Latinas do, and appreciate the technology that gives us this ability.  I’d like to find ways to incorporate this type of practice each week.  While we all are busy, I think that finding ways to connect “in person” feeds not only our *souls* but our minds, if those are 2 different substances?!

And so, as I countdown the minutes to our FaceTime meeting, I am reminded of the gift of engaging with folks across differences and creating more room on the bridge for radical relating.  Remember, “radical” simply means grasping for something at the root!  Let us all strive for a type of rooted relating that anchors us all on the wind-swayed bridge.

Here’s to Friday Fireside Chats!  Theologian meets QueerEthicist over FaceTime.

Chimeras, domestication of genetic engineering, and the death of Evolution

Today I listened to Radiolab on NPR.  It was a fascinating show today about chimeras!  If you have a chance, check out the episode.  The episode is “Mix & Match.”

I have some thoughts about the episode that I’d like to put down here in blogging.

As someone who tends to think about creativity and generativity, I wonder about the domestication of genetic engineering and biotechnology.  What are the implications of the intentional creation/procurement of chimeras?  I value reality of “mixing” and likely think we can’t get away from it, but what does it mean for us to “push” embryos together to make a geep? (A geep is a mixture of a sheep and a goat, and is a chimera.)  What about when the embryos of twins are pushed together in utero and the fetus that is born actually has 2 sets of DNA?  And, furthermore, what of the domestication of genetic engineering?

Are we at the end of Evolution and are, in fact, being creative with the notion of life? Are we all participating in creating life?  Today we can buy DNA dust to create living or organic things.  What does this mean for the question of “life?”  Does life have a much more broader meaning?  Have we evolved into this stage of scientific inquiry?

I don’t know the answers to these questions, but found this episode to provoke lots of ethical questions that are yet lingering in my mind!  And, I am a mixed-raced person, but I am no chimera.  Or, am I?

Think! Different!

‎”Here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They’re not fond of rules. And they have no respect for the status quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can’t do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do. – Apple Inc.”

Here’s To The Crazy Ones from Ralph Quintero on Vimeo.

Apple. Steve Jobs. Creative Energies.

Inspiring…

No one wants to die. Even people who want to go to heaven don’t want to die to get there. And yet death is the destination we all share. No one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be, because Death is very likely the single best invention of Life. It is Life’s change agent. It clears out the old to make way for the new. Right now the new is you, but someday not too long from now, you will gradually become the old and be cleared away. Sorry to be so dramatic, but it is quite true.

Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life. Don’t be trapped by dogma — which is living with the results of other people’s thinking. Don’t let the noise of others’ opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.

- Steve Jobs, Stanford Commencement Speech 2005